The Qur’anic Chronology of Creation

Mecca, also known as Makkah, holds unparalleled significance in Islam as the holiest city and the birthplace of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). It is home to the Kaabah, the most sacred structure in Islam, which Muslims believe was originally built by the first Prophet Adam (peace be upon him) and later it was rebuilt by Ibrahim ( Abraham) and his son Isma’il (Ishmael) as the first house of worship dedicated to the One God. Muslims around the world face the Kaaba during their daily prayers (Salah), symbolizing unity and submission to Allah.
Dr. Jay Smith challenges the historicity of Makkah as an ancient city, as the Qur’an claims its historicity as the foremost House of Worship erected in it. Dr. Jay Smith claims that Makkah is mentioned in no ancient records including the ancient scriptures. This claim is totally wrong and extremely biased based on purely arrogance and ignorance.
Watch this video that mocks the Qur’an with the title “Mecca is a Joke“
Surah Al-Imran (3:96) of the Qur’an states:
“Surely the first House of worship established for humanity is the one at Bakkah—a blessed sanctuary and a guide for all people. In it are clear signs and the standing-place of Abraham. Whoever enters it should be safe. Pilgrimage to this House is an obligation by Allah upon whoever is able among the people. And whoever disbelieves, then surely Allah is not in need of any of His creation.”
According to Islamic scholarship, this verse refers to the Kaaba in Makkah, highlighting its significance as the first and most important place of worship established for humankind. Scholars generally agree that “Bakkah” is an ancient name for Makkah. Some interpretations suggest that Bakkah refers specifically to the valley or town where the Kaabah is located, while Makkah refers to the Masjid al-Haram.
Habakkuk is one of the books of the Bible and is part of the collection known as the Minor Prophets in the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible. The etymology of the name Habakkuk reveals that Habakkuk can be translated as The Bakkah.
In Hebrew, “Ha” (הַ or הָ) is the definite article equivalent to “the” in English. It is a prefix attached to nouns to specify that they are definite. Here’s a detailed explanation of how it is used:
Form and Usage:
Phonetic Changes:
Usage in Sentences:
Comparative Example with Indefinite Nouns:
The Han-nabi (the Prophet) is added before the name Habakkauk (The Bakkah) to show that Habakkuk was a prophet, while there is no information available about this so-called prophet in the Bible and Rabbinic literature including Talmud and Midrash. So, it simply means that the word Ha-nabi is a distortion and was not a part of the original scripture. If Habakkuk was a prophet, he should have a short or long biography, that does not exist at all.
A Commentary on the Bible “Enduring Word” says:
“We don’t know much about the prophet Habakkuk from any other book in the Bible.“
Authorship and Date:
Structure:
Themes:
Habakkuk’s Complaints and God’s Responses:
God’s Second Response (Habakkuk 2:2-20):
Habakkuk’s Prayer (Habakkuk 3):
The Jewish Rabbis generally say that the Book of Habakkuk was the prediction of the destruction of Judah by the Babylonians or Chaldeans. While in reality the prophesy is about the rise of Banu Qedar or Qedarites.
The Book of Habakkuk is an allegorical dialogue between Bakkah/Makkah and the Lord. The Bakkah complained about injustice and violence in Judah.
The word Kasdim which appears in Habakkuk 1:6, has been interpreted differently by the Jewish scholarship. This is the nation that is prophesied in this book raised for the punishment of Judah. Some interpret Kasdim as Babylonians, some others as Chaldeans, and still some others as Romans. In our understanding, they are Banu Qedar or Qedarites.
Habakkuk 3:3:
“God came from Teman and the Holy One from Mount Paran. Selah. His glory covered the heavens, and the earth was full of his praise.”
Mount Paran is the English name for the Arabic name Jebel Faran according to the Jewish Virtual Library.
It is important to note the phrase ‘God came from Teman and the Holy One from Mount Paran.Selah’ should be kept in focus regarding the punishment of Judeans. According to the Muslim scholars Jebel Faran is located at Makkah. Banu Jurhum—Prophet Ismail’s in-laws —named Makkah Selah, which is mentioned in Habakkuk 3:3.
Al-Balazari said in Ansab al-Ashraf:
ونزلت جرهم بمكة وما حولها. وسموها صلاحا
“And the tribe of Jurhum settled in Makkah and its surroundings. They named it Selah.“
So Jebel Faran/Mount Paran and Selah are two important references to Makkah in the Book of the Bakkah (Habakkuk).
Qedar, also spelled Kedar was the eldest son of Prophet Ismail (peace be upon him). Al-Balazari said:
“When God took His prophet Ishmael, his son Kedar (Qedar) ibn Ishmael (Ismail) took responsibility for the House (the Kaaba) after him. His mother was from the tribe of Jurhum. Then (responsibility passed to) Nabet ibn Kedar. Then Tayma ibn Nabet.“
The same genealogy of Qedar, upward and downward, has been attributed to Imam Muhammad ibn Muslim ibn Shehab al-Zohri by Mosab al-Zubairi in Nasb Quraysh.
A Jewish historian from the first century AD, Flavius Josephus in his famous work Antiquities of the Jews (Vol.1, P.43) observes:
When the lad was grown up, he married a wife, by birth an Egyptian, from w^hence the mother was herself derived originally. Of this wife were born to Ishmael twelve sons, Nabaioth, Kedar, Abdeel, Mabsam, Idumas, Masmaos, Masaos, Chodad, Theman, Jetur, Naphesus, Cadmas. These inhabited all the country from Euphrates to the Red Sea, and called it Nabatene. They are an Arabian nation, and name their tribes from these, both because of their own virtue, and because of the dignity of Abraham their father.
Kedar or Qedar or Qedarite was a significant nomadic tribe in ancient Arabia, often mentioned in the Bible and other historical texts. The name “Kedar” (Hebrew: קֵדָר) appears several times in the Old Testament, where it is associated with the descendants of Ishmael, the son of Abraham and Hagar. Specifically, Kedar is listed as one of Ishmael’s sons in Genesis 25:13:
Military Prowess: The tribe is also described as having a strong martial tradition, with skilled archers and warriors. Isaiah 21:16-17 mentions the decline of Kedar’s military might:
Cultural Context: The mention of Kedar in Psalm 120:5, “Woe to me that I dwell in Meshek, that I live among the tents of Kedar!” suggests a cultural distinction between the psalmist’s settled lifestyle and the nomadic existence of Kedar. It also implies a certain sense of isolation or difficulty in relating to the nomadic way of life.
Historically, Kedar is often associated with the Qedarite kingdom, which was a confederation of Arab tribes in the northern Arabian Peninsula. They played a significant role in the politics and economy of the region, particularly from the 8th to the 4th centuries BCE. The Qedarites were known to have interacted with the Assyrian and Babylonian empires, sometimes as allies and sometimes as adversaries.
Certainly! Dumat al-Jandal, historically known as Adummatu, has a rich and significant history, particularly in relation to the ancient Arab kingdoms, including the Qedarites. Here’s an expanded explanation incorporating historical and archaeological insights:
Early References and Inscriptions:
Archaeological Findings:
Later History:
As Flavius Josephus pointed out during his lifetime the area dominated by the descendants of Ismail (peace be upon him) was known as Nabatene. Other research works suggest that now the Arabian nation who governed the Nabatene were known as Nabataeans. Most likely the Nabataeans were descendants of Nabat bin Qedar. So Nabataeans might be another name for Qedarites transformed over centuries. Possibly some nations might call them Nabateeans and other Qedarites.
Flavius Josephus observes in Antiquities of the Jews (Vol.4, P.254) about the Prophet Moses’s expeditions in Jordan:
“Now the Midianites perceiving beforehand how the Hebrews were coming, and would suddenly be upon them, they assembled their army together, and fortified the entrances into their country, and there awaited the enemy’s coming. When they were come, and they had joined battle with them, an immense multitude of the Midianites fell, nor could they be numbered they were so very many: And among them fell their kings, five in number, viz. Evi, Zur, Reba, Hur, and Rekam, who was of the same name with a city, the chief and capital of all Arabia, which is still now so called, by the whole Arabian nation, Arecem, from the name of the king that built it, but is by the Greeks called Petra.“
Certainly! The ancient city of Petra, known in Arabic as Al-Raqeem, holds a significant place in the history of the Arabian Peninsula and the broader ancient world. Here is an expanded discussion on Petra (Al-Raqeem) and its historical significance:
Name and Etymology:
Geographical Location:
Historical Background:

Architectural Marvels:
Cultural and Political Influence:
Integration into the Roman Empire:
Decline and Rediscovery:
Modern Significance:
Archeologists have studied the Nabataean inscriptions scattered in Ar-Raqeem (Petra). Though Nabataean graffiti is inscribed in Aramaic script, the language used is purely Arabic. The Nabataeans had polytheistic beliefs sharing the same deities worshipped in Makkah and Madina. DuShara, Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, Al-Manat, and Hubul are the major deities worshipped in Hejaz and Ar-Raqeem. This resemblance in beliefs suggests a strong historical and cultural connection between the two neighboring regions.
Nabataean Inscriptions:

Religious Beliefs and Deities:
[The Religion of the Nabataeans: A Conspectus: p.182]
Cultural Connections:
Historical Significance:
The study of Nabataean inscriptions and religious practices reveals a deep cultural and historical connection between Petra (Ar-Raqeem) and the Hejaz region, including Makkah and Madina. The use of an early form of Arabic in Nabataean inscriptions, despite being written in the Aramaic script, highlights the linguistic and cultural transitions in the region. The shared pantheon of deities such as DuShara, Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, Al-Manat, and Hubal underscores the religious links between these areas. These connections illustrate the interconnectedness of ancient Arabian societies through trade, cultural exchange, and shared religious traditions, reflecting a rich and complex pre-Islamic heritage.
Now read the chapter of the Qur’an (Al-Quraysh) that mentions the trade roots of summer and winter as a sign of the Lord’s blessings upon the people of Makkah:
˹At least˺ for ˹the favour of˺ making Quraysh habitually secure—secure in their trading caravan (to Yemen) in the winter and (Syria) in the summer—let them worship the Lord of this ˹Sacred˺ House, Who has fed them against hunger and made them secure against fear.
Can anyone who knows the described history of Kedarites and Nabataeans, can claim that the Qur’anic narrative is irrelevant and out of context? Tell Dr. Jay Smith that Makkah is not a joke but it is a ground fact from Arabian antiquity.
Theophanes the Confessor was a notable Byzantine monk, chronicler, and saint who lived during the 8th and early 9th centuries. His full name is Theophanes the Confessor, also known as Theophanes Isauricus. He is particularly renowned for his contributions to Byzantine historiography and his steadfast defense of the veneration of icons during the period of Iconoclasm.
Theophanes was born around 758 CE into a wealthy and influential family in Roman capital Constantinople or its vicinity. His father, Isaac, was a high-ranking official, and his family enjoyed a significant social and economic standing. Despite the privileges of his birth, Theophanes chose a life of religious dedication.
Theophanes’ most significant contribution to history is his “Chronographia” (The Chronicle), which he compiled in the early 9th century. This work is a continuation of the historical chronicle of George Syncellus and covers the period from 284 to 813 CE, spanning from the accession of Emperor Diocletian to the reign of Michael I Rangabe.
Theophanes lived in the time when the Byzantine Empire was facing a bad decline and the Romans were defeated by the Muslim Arab armies in the Arabian Peninsula. They lost Palestine and Jerusalem, which made them very aggressive toward Muslims. Theopanes’s remarks on Islam, Muslims, the Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him), and Makkah were very humiliating and showed his extreme hatred for Islamic identities.
Theophanes the Confessor wrote his “Chronographia” approximately a century and a half after the death of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), making his observations on Islam particularly significant from a historical perspective. These observations serve as an early external corroboration of the existence of Muhammad, his teachings, and Islamic sacred places. Here are some logical arguments to support the importance of Theophanes’ remarks:
Theophanes’ work was composed relatively close to the time of Prophet Muhammad’s life (circa 570–632 CE). Writing in the early 9th century, Theophanes was only about 150 years removed from the foundational events of Islam. This proximity in time means that Theophanes had access to sources and accounts that were much closer to the original events than later historians, providing a more immediate perspective on the early Islamic period.
As a Byzantine chronicler, Theophanes’ primary focus was not on Islamic history but on Byzantine events. Therefore, his references to Islam and its prophet are independent corroborations from a non-Muslim source. This external validation is crucial for historians because it provides evidence outside of Islamic traditions and texts, enhancing the credibility of the historical existence of Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the early development of Islam.
Theophanes’ remarks affirm several critical aspects of Islamic tradition:
Theophanes provides context about the Byzantine perspective on the rise of Islam. His descriptions help modern historians understand how Islam was perceived by one of its neighboring civilizations. This perspective is invaluable for constructing a comprehensive picture of the early Islamic period, including the interactions between Muslims and Byzantines.
The remarks of Theophanes allow historians to perform comparative analyses between Byzantine and Islamic records of the same period. This comparison helps in cross-verifying events, dates, and figures, leading to a more nuanced and accurate historical narrative.
Theophanes’ “Chronographia” influenced later Byzantine and Western historians. His account serves as a bridge between earlier sources and subsequent medieval historiography, ensuring that details about early Islam were transmitted and considered in later historical analyses.
In summary, Theophanes the Confessor’s observations in the “Chronographia” are vital for historical research. They provide independent, contemporaneous corroboration of the existence of Prophet Muhammad, his teachings, and Islamic sacred places, thereby enriching our understanding of early Islamic history and its broader historical context.

[The Chronicle Of Theophanes Confessor, p.509]
In the highlighted paragraph Theophanes describes an event of Abdul Malik (Abimelech) bin Marwan’s reign, when he sent an expedition against Abdullah ibn Zubair who announced his Caliphate in Makkah and surroundings. Crhonographia affirms the existence of a sacred temple (Ka’abah) in Makkah (Mecca). Actually, there were no idols in Ka’abah at Abdul Malik’s time, but the chronicle expressed his biased view in these baseless words.
Theophanes observes further:

[The Chronicle Of Theophanes Confessor, p.510]
Why did Abdul Malik give instructions to rebuild the temple of Makkah? Because it is a highly esteemed and venerated place by the Muslims. since the Prophet Muhammad’s time. So Theophanes’s words affirm the significance of Makkah from early days of Islam. Theophanes leveled all the wicked plans of Dr. Jay Smith and his fellow men. Allah is the Greatest.